For audit firms
Prepare the evidence for professional review.
Financial forensics, risk assessment and going concern from journal data. Detection domains, risk indicators and working checklists help prepare the review; the auditor remains responsible for the conclusion.
For the audit team
Less preparation. More time to assess.
Bring analytical and forensic preparation into a connected workflow.
Screen the journal, then review the evidence
Apply journal-level checks such as Benford analysis, round amounts and related-party signals to help prioritise investigation.
Pre-audit risk indicators
Use a 0–100 risk score as an input to planning, with the underlying findings available for review.
Working audit checklist
Use journal findings to inform a checklist and adapt it to the engagement and industry.
From journal to working report
Import, map, review signals and prepare a report without recreating every calculation in a spreadsheet.
Across the audit workflow
The same phases, better-connected evidence.
FynTwin supports your methodology by reducing repetitive preparation and keeping the data behind a finding accessible.
Planning and risk assessment
Consider prior-year data, industry comparisons and going concern indicators when planning the engagement.
ISA 315Forensics and analytical procedures
Review nine domains, including Benford analysis, round amounts, period-end patterns, related parties, revenue, purchasing, cash, late postings and duplicates, with links to the source entries.
ISA 240Conclusion and going concern
Compare Altman Z, Taffler and Springate and cash-flow scenarios. Review and finalise a working draft with reference to ISA 570.
ISA 570Financial forensics · nine domains
Put the journal under review.
Review detection domains across imported data. Findings contribute to risk indicators and connect to source transactions.
Explore the journal before planning the next procedure.
FynTwin is a licensed product available by enquiry. Contact us to assess its fit for your audit practice.